To understand the figure of Fatimah bint Abd al Malik of Nishapur one must undertake a journey into the heart of the ninth century into an Islamic world still young filled with spiritual and intellectual tension in which religious disciplines had not yet assumed the institutional forms we now associate with tradition. It was a world where the word Sufism did not yet exist as a defined category and the search for the divine unfolded through personal networks oral exchanges interiorized forms of asceticism and a slow refinement of the heart. It is no coincidence that many of the most important figures of that period are for us almost faceless and without documents men and women remembered not for what they wrote but for what they transformed in the hearts of those who met them. Fatimah of Nishapur emerges precisely from this hidden zone of spiritual history. She lived in the third century of the Hijra roughly between eight hundred twenty and nine hundred of the Christian era and belonged to the cultural world of Khurasan the vast Persian region that today includes northeastern Iran parts of Afghanistan and Central Asia. In the Abbasid era this region was a pulsating center of the empire a crossroads of trade along the Silk Road an intellectual and religious laboratory that contributed perhaps more than Baghdad itself to the formation of Islamic mystical sensibility. Nishapur her city flourished in an extraordinary way. Medieval chronicles describe crowded streets prestigious schools animated libraries markets where Arabs Persians Turks Jews Indians and converted Buddhists met. The city hosted one of the most important schools of prophetic transmission hadith and at the same time it was a center of the most radical Islamic asceticism. Walking through its streets in the ninth century meant encountering preachers jurists itinerant mystics and ascetics who had already begun to develop an inner discipline that would later be called tasawwuf the spiritual dimension of Islam. It is in this fertile cultural ground that some of the founding figures of Sufism appear Dhu al Nun al Misri who died in eight hundred fifty nine considered the first theorist of marifah the inner knowledge of God Abu Hafs al Haddad who died in eight hundred seventy four master of ascetic discipline Abu Uthman al Hiri who died in nine hundred ten one of the great trainers of the next generation. These men travelers and deep thinkers defined through their lives the contours of a religion lived not only as ritual but as transformation of being. It is precisely in the midst of this spiritual universe that we meet Fatimah a woman who did not belong to any formal school who did not guide a public circle and who left no writings. Yet she was recognized by her contemporaries as one of the highest spiritual authorities of her time. Her figure emerges above all thanks to al Sulami the great historian of early Sufism who lived between the tenth and eleventh centuries. In his Dhikr an nisa al mutabbidat a work that gathers the lives of devout and mystical women of the early Islamic centuries he describes her as arifah bi Allah meaning one who knows God inwardly. This is not a generic expression. In the technical language of Sufism it means possessing a type of awareness that transcends religion understood as ritual observance and leads toward a degree of inner presence in which every movement of the heart is vigilant disciplined and oriented toward the divine. The confirmation of her greatness does not come only from the words of historians but from those of her contemporaries and this is the most surprising fact. Dhu al Nun an immense figure in the history of Sufism said he had learned from Fatimah what he still lacked to understand sincerity. Sincerity in Islamic spirituality is not a feeling but a force that purifies intention a way of aligning heart and action so that nothing stands between creature and Creator. For a man of the stature of Dhu al Nun to acknowledge a woman as his teacher was extraordinary. Abu Hafs al Haddad rigorous and severe like few others confessed that he felt judged directly by God whenever he spoke in her presence as if her very being forced an immediate inner cleansing. To understand what these masters mean when they speak of Fatimah’s rank one must explain to the non Muslim reader certain key concepts of the Sufi experience. The first is tawhid the divine unity. For the Muslim God is radically one nothing in creation can be compared to His essence. This concept apparently theological has enormous psychological and spiritual consequences the human heart cannot lean on God and on something else at the same time. Everything that creates dependence whether affection power knowledge or prestige generates a small fracture in lived tawhid. This does not mean that the believer must flee from the world but that he must be vigilant toward the inner movements that turn a legitimate interest into a diseased attachment. Fatimah insisted precisely on this point not on theology but on the secret inclinations of the soul. The second essential concept is nafs the lower self the psychological component of the human being that tends to deceive to exaggerate its merits to hide its faults to seek gratification and to avoid the fatigue of inner honesty. Sufism is to a large extent a continual struggle against the illusions of the nafs. The hardest asceticism is not fasting or isolation but the discipline that requires looking within oneself without self absolution. Fatimah was an expert in this science. Her words transmitted in fragmentary form reveal an extremely refined sensitivity when she said that many believe they are sincere while they are not she was not discouraging but indicating the gap between what a person thinks he is and what the heart actually is before God. The third fundamental concept is dhikr an Arabic word meaning remembrance. Dhikr is the quintessential spiritual practice of Sufism and consists in keeping alive through the repetition of sacred words or through vigilant silence the awareness of divine presence. In early Sufism dhikr was not a technique accompanied by codified ritual but a continual exercise of the memory of the heart. Repeating a name of God such as Allah was not a magical mantra but a way to return to what is essential whenever the mind disperses. Some schools preferred spoken dhikr others silent dhikr which consists in being aware of one’s breath and heart as if each movement were a remembrance of God. The Naqshbandi school which would develop many centuries later would dedicate special attention to this silent dhikr a radical form of inner presence in which the tongue does not move but the heart does not stop remembering as if being far from the Creator even for an instant were impossible. For a non Muslim reader dhikr can be compared only very partially to contemplative meditation in other traditions but with a crucial difference it does not aim to empty the mind or create psychological well being but to establish a living relationship with a living Presence. Dhikr is relationship not abstract introspection. It is a dialogue without words. Fatimah lived this presence with such intensity that some masters felt in her company the same sobriety and depth that centuries later the Naqshbandiyya would theorize. The Naqshbandiyya founded in the fourteenth century around the figure of Baha al Din Naqshband of Bukhara is today one of the most important Sufi brotherhoods of Central Asia spreading as far as Turkey and the Indian Subcontinent. It is characterized by discretion interiority spiritual rigor and the refusal of mystical exhibition. Its implicit motto is to live God without noise without theatricality without seeking the gaze of others. The idea that the highest saints are those unknown to the world and perfectly known to God represents the essence of the Naqshbandi way. This is why many saw in Fatimah a hidden teacher before her time of the Naqshbandiyya not because she belonged to that historical lineage which did not yet exist but because she naturally embodied those principles through a purity of intention that in later centuries would become the hallmark of the brotherhood. To grasp how radical her sensitivity was one must explore her idea of being hidden. It was not social isolation. She was not a woman withdrawn to mountains or a hermitage. Fatimah lived in the city walked through its streets knew its world. What is extraordinary is that she managed to be inwardly alone while immersed in society. This condition which later Naqshbandi masters would call khalwat dar anjuman solitude within the crowd indicates a very high degree of spiritual discipline a heart that does not allow itself to be pulled by the noise of the world because it sees in it only passing veils and continually orients itself toward what does not pass. The presence of Fatimah in the history of Sufism is therefore not peripheral as might appear to those who judge importance by the number of writings or disciples. Her legacy is qualitative not quantitative. What makes her great is the radical nature of her interiority the lucidity with which she unmasked the hidden motivations of the soul the non negotiable sincerity she demanded from herself before demanding it from others the absolute refusal of the spiritualization of the ego that refined form of vanity through which a person believes himself elevated only because he performs acts of devotion. Her vision of the spiritual path has a force that crosses centuries because it is not based on outward methods but on a lucid attention to the movements of the heart a discipline that does not belong to an age but to the human being as such. In a world like ours dominated by visibility and the search for recognition the figure of Fatimah appears as a sign of contradiction. She reminds us that spirituality is first of all hidden work that sincerity grows better in silence than in noise that the heart purifies itself more easily when it is not under the eyes of others that true greatness has no need to announce itself. Her voice reaches us through the words of the masters who knew her and through the fragments preserved by tradition. It is a calm demanding voice capable of seeing in the soul what the soul does not see on its own. Her greatest lesson may be summarized in this way do not try to shine before people strive to be clear before God. In this sentence in its ultimate simplicity lies the most intimate dimension of the inner Islam.
Roberto Minichini, January 2026
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento